Suman Kumar Sundarbabu

Senior Analyst with Satyam Venture Engineering Services, specializing in occupant safety injury evaluation and CAE correlation. Proven expertise in PAMCRASH and LSDYNA, enhancing analysis accuracy. Strong project planning and team leadership skills drive successful outcomes in complex crash simulations, ensuring optimal vehicle safety performance.

Pursuing N4 Japanese Language.(Communicate Basic Level)

1. Have been awarded “FUNCTIONAL EXCELLENCE “for module library setup for Bcar program.

2. Have been awarded “FTSI EXCELLENCE AWARD” for Delivery of FNA safety models for gateway build.

3. Have been Recognized with Japanese Client for the Effective Countermeasure and RootCause for Frontal ODB64 Load-case in crucial time.

1.Involved in preparation of SOP’s(standard operating procedure) for various domains.

2. Quality checks sheets.

3. Knowledge sharing activity within the team and documentations.

4. Have been actively helped for the effecting resource utilization and processing at client location to reduce the project idle time.

5. Adopted and took complete self initiation to understand PSA project Process with New tool setups within stipulated time & conducted knowledge sharing sessions for other team members.

 Analysis (BEV Vehicle) 

 1. SIDE OBLIQUE POLE and DUECARE Impact analysis: 

• Scope of Analysis is to Achieve the Structural stability and Battery Safety.
• Design solutions / Countermeasures are suggested to client for the Evaluation items which were not meeting the Target.
• Analysis has been solved using RADIOSS solver. And post processing been done using Meta post.
• Continuous interaction with Design team to make sure the Countermeasure implementations for the Feasibility.

 2. Frontal Impact Analysis ( Pick up Truck): 

• Full Vehicle model has been prepared to submit the run (LSDYNA).
• Frontal Impact Analysis Target Evaluation items (Frame deformation, Cabin deformation, vehicle - pulse, Contact forces, Fuel integrity) has been analyzed and plotted.
• Countermeasures are brainstormed for notachieved evaluation items. (WHY-WHY analysis).
• Design solutions are proposed to client with achieved models and PPT documents. (WAKARI YASUI method)
• Design solutions and production feasibility are discussed among cross functional team.

 3. Structural performance Analysis (Full Frontal Rigid, ODB56-64) 

• Model set up has been done using Hyper-mesh and ANSA (preprocessor).
• Model boundary conditions have been updated as per the standard Regulations. EURO NCAP
• Analysis has been solved using Ls Dyna solver. And report been done using Animator, Ls Pre post (Post Processors)
• • Understanding the further requirements from client side to improve more.(Continuous improvement